I represent 25 NYCHA developments, more than any DSA elected official. If you want to understand why many of my constituents—who’ve waited all their lives for NYCHA to make repairs—don’t agree with you, you should try talking to them, or invite us next time you have a teach-in.https://twitter.com/JuliaCarmel__/status/1463986288449703938 …
-
-
I think these are both valid takes, btw. I’m just trying to explain what the debate is about. I think the ability to bring NYCHA, a public agency, into the 21st century is necessary for it to survive as a public agency - but I get/respect resident distrust of the plan!
-
TLDR: I don’t think it’s fair to say shorthand Blueprint = privatization - I think it’s more complicated than that!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think those are very legitimate concerns from NYCHA residents. The MTA and DOE operate quite poorly. NYPL I can’t speak on as much per se.
-
Totally agree! But NYCHA also operates poorly as is, arguably to much larger harm than DOE/MTA. In general tho I’m happy: this is the beginning of necessary debate for socialists abt the best way to structure public agencies! I’d like debate it in nicer/better faith ways!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your need to change that to WHEN not IF as the Trust will get tenant protection vouchers and use those to place land and developments themselves up as collateral.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.