probably too much of a conversation to have here but i think this issue is being mischaracterized a bit. and repairs need to happen immediately
-
-
Replying to @wyrdtweeter
i don’t think anything is being mischaracterized, can you speak to what is being mischaracterized? repairs need to happen of course, but not at the expense of privatisation long term when we want to move toward increased tenant control & governance
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @matrixgoth
i think it’s too much of a convo to have on twitter and almost certainly don’t know more than you about it. but this isn’t the first time BED has attacked other leftists
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @matrixgoth @wyrdtweeter
Imo the trust reduces the risk of privatization and actually enhances resident governance
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
-
-
Replying to @matrixgoth
S9 is v vulnerable & depends on tenants having political power at the federal level which is impossible to do from 1 state; all s9 governance rights are carried over plus additional board representation; the ability to opt-out of *any* conversion incld RAD which doesn’t exist now
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ceaweaver
got it. i have more trust specific questions that cld be off twit but mainly 1) who decided the impossibility of nationwide S9 organizing at federal level and why 2) who is deciding that this can’t be done and why 3) who is deciding organizing timelines & setting expectations
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
1) no one decided - anyone can do it if you want. I believe it’s impossible bc there isn’t much S9 housing left outside of NYC so it’s hard to build the national coalition
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.