Changing the way Area Median Income is calculated would be as helpful in addressing our housing crisis as measuring building heights in meters instead of feet.
-
So is your point is that bc LIHTC is pegged to 60% of AMI, if we change AMI definitions, LIHTC will reach more serve more income households, who we today call 30-40% AMI households?
That may be true, I suppose, but would result in net fewer units bc everything would still cost the same. And maybe that’s a policy point to make - we should build fewer units that are more deeply affordable. But again, there is a neater and less convoluted way to make that point
-
-
And it’s also not a policy position I would take! We should have a public developer who can build more social units and commit more subsidy to the projects but also the units should be affordable at a range of income levels The housing plan has to cost money though - lots
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.