2) …first, *most* recent, actual community pushbacks to rezoning plans in NYC aren’t coming from an exclusionary/racist place. They’re in opposition to MIH developments, which are always mostly luxury and offer only crumbs of affordability. They’ve been engines of displacement.
-
-
3)…the second & most important thing is that these rezonings are almost always hatched in back rooms with developers & city agencies like CPC & EDC. Absent deep reform of these agencies, any citywide rezoning plan will and should be looked at with suspicion by average NYers.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
4) So the solution should probably be a 2-pronged approach balancing out truly public city agencies that sever ties to for-profit developers, and strong community input. Checks & balances. But including developers in planning decisions is literally a conflict of interest.
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ArtistStudioAP @bdlimm
in good faith: #2 is objectively untrue. e.g. soho/noho: ppl honestly concerned w/ displacement aligned w ppl who are *not* to form a political coalition #3 - let's start there, then. let's talk about what we can do to rebuild trust in the public sector. i'm really into that.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
#4 - who is the community? deciding that is really messy. how are you going to decide whose voice "counts"? we need to think seriously about that and i haven't observed that anywhere. i don't see how your vision doesn't prioritize those who currently have economic power
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Is it? Isn’t it just about talking to directly impacted people? I feel like this is taking the perspective of the city w/different constituencies coming to them, not the perspective of an organizer or someone directly impacted.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @zekeluger @ceaweaver and
I’ve collected feedback on housing development & transit projects, & it wasn’t particularly messy. It was just about going into communities and talking to people- tabling, door-knocking, having conversations at bus stops, meeting people where they’re at.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @zekeluger @ceaweaver and
If you want the policy/statistics pov, it’s just talking to a representative sample of directly impacted people. On most issues, there was more or less consensus once I talked to a couple people. It wasn’t that hard to gauge.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @zekeluger @ceaweaver and
Our governments just aren’t proactive about going into communities, so they’re put in a position of deciding who is the community, which is kind of f*cked up. And I’m worried DSA isn’t always doing that work either, to develop policy in conjunction with directly impacted people.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Deciding that the anti-rezoning movement in lower manhattan is all rich white people who don’t want low-income folks in the nabe is super off-base. Shows a lack of on the ground engagement. Twitter ain’t it.
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes
Cea Weaver Retweeted Cea Weaver
Jenny - you know I didn’t say that. You know I said the opposite. All I said is folks honestly and legitimately concerned w displacement ended up aligned w folks who aren’t. I respect you a lot - call me if you want to talk about my position on this or other things.https://twitter.com/ceaweaver/status/1471999772772950016 …
Cea Weaver added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.