we need to move forward towards a citywide plan with social housing/public housing goals as well as towards a robust, democratic planning process that reduces power imbalances and race/class inequality - and really quite far from “local deference” as a proxy for the second
-
-
Replying to @ceaweaver @bdlimm
I am a big believer in participatory democracy and figuring forms for working class / collective governance over political processes and decision making but “local” = a problematic shorthand for that in a society as ridiculously segregated as ours.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ceaweaver @bdlimm
1) the potential for racist local opposition to development is absolutely there and could be deeply problematic for sure. But two on-the-ground realities must be raised…
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
2) …first, *most* recent, actual community pushbacks to rezoning plans in NYC aren’t coming from an exclusionary/racist place. They’re in opposition to MIH developments, which are always mostly luxury and offer only crumbs of affordability. They’ve been engines of displacement.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
3)…the second & most important thing is that these rezonings are almost always hatched in back rooms with developers & city agencies like CPC & EDC. Absent deep reform of these agencies, any citywide rezoning plan will and should be looked at with suspicion by average NYers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
4) So the solution should probably be a 2-pronged approach balancing out truly public city agencies that sever ties to for-profit developers, and strong community input. Checks & balances. But including developers in planning decisions is literally a conflict of interest.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtistStudioAP @bdlimm
in good faith: #2 is objectively untrue. e.g. soho/noho: ppl honestly concerned w/ displacement aligned w ppl who are *not* to form a political coalition #3 - let's start there, then. let's talk about what we can do to rebuild trust in the public sector. i'm really into that.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
#4 - who is the community? deciding that is really messy. how are you going to decide whose voice "counts"? we need to think seriously about that and i haven't observed that anywhere. i don't see how your vision doesn't prioritize those who currently have economic power
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ceaweaver @bdlimm
this is an issue for any type of community engagement—always a determination that needs to be made. City planning said it consulted “the community” with Amazon.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtistStudioAP @bdlimm
agree, but you haven't offered an alternative other than more "community" which absent changes that alter social/economic dynamics will backfire
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So in HJ4A we are exploring 1) good cause = a right to organize a TU 2) a legal right to tenant collective bargaining 3) TOPA all as mechanisms to increase tenant-political power
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.