Sorry Cea, I should have saved that one for a thread because the connection isn't obvious or commonly discussed. But basically it's about a core assumption about what is more important to our economies: private property (real estate) to privately financialize or full employment.
-
To some extent yes, but the Council could pass a process that creates more leverage for organized local input than previously. (One example: a rezoning process in which locally derived expectations come first & become app preconditions, as opposed to mere factors in negotiation.)
Bright - this is an *extremely* troubling thing to suggest when you take even a surface level look at how communities have leveraged zoning to exert local preferences on who is allowed to live where.
-
-
we need to move forward towards a citywide plan with social housing/public housing goals as well as towards a robust, democratic planning process that reduces power imbalances and race/class inequality - and really quite far from “local deference” as a proxy for the second
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.