Genuine question: what is the non municipal bond approach on the table?
-
Show this thread
-
Like are we talking about a public bank? Because I generally assumed that that would also involve municipal bonds? Or just pushing for a cash influx without debt?
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Tbc have no connection whatsoever to this debate, blueprint, the DSA, etc. Just a nerd who is generally curious.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @jennyaction
Within the debate it’s just more section 9 and/or direct operating subsidies that are not voucher-based
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @jennyaction
Do you know if NYCHA accepts rent payments from cityfheps? I know they are eligible but not prioritized for ERAP. (Basically trying to figure out if we win HAVP if that would/could be an operating subsidy for NYCHA?)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But yes the anti-bond side is cash influx, no debt. But also no vouchers. So I think it would have to be a whole new operating stream at the state level that current doesn’t exist , or section 9
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.