Over 90% of NY capital project financing comes through public authorities selling bonds. Bonds/debt aren’t inherently bad. Like all tools, it depends on how they’re used. Without bonds large scale public projects are literally impossible.
-
-
Replying to @b_kepp14
I think the question of democratic & tenant control over how those bonds are sold & how that leveraged capital is used is, as far as the blueprint goes, really in question!
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @unit01barbie @b_kepp14
Agree Kay, but the imo the trust actually expands resident control over the agency both in the legislation and by virtue of the fact that it gives more state (not federal) control over the agency. And residents have to vote to put their bdg in the trust, so it’s not automatic
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
There are reasons to be wary of leveraging the bdgs and the debt. but from an organizing perspective and tenant-power perspective the path to more resident control over the bdgs is thru the trustpic.twitter.com/4r9RRDXebf
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.