You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
This take is deeply disturbing to me and frankly harmful to the work many people are trying to do to stop displacement. The fact that you think you’re ‘above’ the discourse 
which part of the take do you think is disturbing? i don't think anything i said here is really all that controversial - building a bigger base for public/social housing that serves all
Hmmm. Rezonings are not social housing at all. Building a broad coalition together to support actual social housing and to protect NYCHA from privatization is a great idea. It is already happening.
That’s my point! I dunno I guess it’s best not to discuss this on Twitter but I’ll try: 1/3
- rezoning ≠ new development of social housing, I agree! and rezoning debates talk abt subsidy far too little, as @jennyaction points out. It’s a dead end imo!
In brief, you are coming out in support of soho (a plan for 75% luxury housing) as we rally people to testify against it. See the clip from @artagainstnyc below. Affordable for who is a vital question. These are bad deals for the community and we are allowed to point that out.
i don’t think cea is coming out in support of the rezoning ! i think cea’s saying that it’s flawed but may bring short term benefit & convos don’t get at the expansion of status quo / expansion of the developer class
I would love to build a bigger base in support of public housing. Im just wondering why you see accepting a deal that enriches developers and displaces low income ppl as part of that mission. It makes you an enemy of LES organizers who do want to expand *real* affordability.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
