-
-
right lol my next tweet
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
I think this is why a lot of us panicked when the Kim news came out. Not because we feel like we all lost our most hopeful candidate. But because we knew that the weirdness of RCV could be lose-lose for all the candidates we're talking about unless one broke through to 15-20%
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @brianvan, @ceaweaver ja
My thinking: do Morales, Garcia, Wiley, and maybe even a few others deserve to be taken seriously for the role? Absolutely. Is there one clearly positioned better at this point? M/G/W are currently B-tier in this race. The only optimism is that they're not far behind Adams
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @brianvan, @ceaweaver ja
And this is just anecdotal for me, but I've dropped Stringer from my rankings. Like, if he DID those things (and it sure looks like it), how do you justify electing him?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @brianvan, @ceaweaver ja
In addition to the accusation of sexual misconduct, reading SO MANY anecdotes about him being a hardball dick in his decades in politics was more than enough to write him off. I get why the Biaggis and Bowmans of the world jumped on early, AOC was smart not to. Always a weird fit
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @nico_press, @ceaweaver ja
I justified the "hardball" stuff because he is a creature of this system & we hadn't gotten to the point where anyone made a viable case to remake the system. It quietly became an advantage. It shouldn't have been. People are delusional if they think Tusk is going to be softer
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @brianvan, @ceaweaver ja
Oh absolutely which is why if I had to choose between Yang or Adams I’d go with the parochial weirdo who could be checked by a strong council over Bradley Fucking Tusk’s cutout.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @nico_press, @brianvan ja
Yang isn't a "rubber stamp" for Tusk, and he's clearly to the left of Adams. Why wouldn't Yang be "checked" or work with city council?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @SiFan77217194, @brianvan ja
This doesn’t inspire confidencepic.twitter.com/XSMdHw1tTd
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
It's not clear who Yang is accountable to or what he sees his base as. I don't know that the council has *that* much power to check the Mayor who is executing a vast amount of decisions on a day to day basis. But yes, who they elect speaker is going to be important.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.