To me, Mitchell Lama 2.0 would mean a massive public investment in social housing. It’s what we need. #HomesGuarantee
NY Housing Twitter pls weigh in and tell me what “Mitchell Lama 2.0” means to you!!!
-
-
-
Agree - social housing though is poorly defined and one could (though I wouldn’t) argue that it’s what the de blasio administration is doing right now. “
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s something tenant / housing advocates say a lot as a solution and I wanna know why!
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
It could be the city and state using their power and money to formally and systematically create and support Community Land Trusts.
-
I agree w community land trusts and other mechanisms for limited profit and local control, but that’s not at all inherent to the ML program whatsoever
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Affordable homeownership created or converted at scale...but this time on CLTs to ensure permanence.
-
“Affordable homeownership” at scale has always only been exceedingly exclusionary and particularly racist
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why do you think the housing ideas that resonate with a lot of people--"Mitchell Lama 2.0," "a Marshall Plan for NYCHA," "Green New Deal for Housing"--are all essentially backwards-looking?
-
Nostalgia for NY that didn’t feel corporate / gentrifiery.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.