Depends on what policies you're pushing. If low-income homeowners are pushing local control of every development decision, as we are seeing from some in #NHV, then they are aligning themselves with wealthy suburbanites to the detriment of all renters.
-
-
Replying to @anikasinghlemar @DanielKayHertz
Today’s homeowners in cities are tomorrow’s victims of the next foreclosure crisis. Today’s renters are tomorrow’s homeowners. Seeking structural change that is bigger than renter vs homeowner and socialist but helps the ordinary folks in both camps is good!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alextt
I'm hoping to make a difference this century, not next. And if you're really seeking that change you ought to be hanging on the doors of federal and state government, demanding dollars for social housing, not fighting a hyperlocal upzoning.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @anikasinghlemar
I’m with you on the rezonings—and I agree with focusing on state and federal government. I think the NYC folks last night were saying to do just that, bang on the doors
for social housing. @ceaweaver’s exchange with LAA’s Atty. Eppler-Epstein on IZ, I thought, brought that out1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alextt @anikasinghlemar
Cea Weaver Retweeted Cea Weaver
Hi! So as one of the advocates, I have argued and argue *against* homeownership as a wealth-building all the time and have worked to build a coalition that explicitly brings together renters, public housing advocates, and the homelesshttps://twitter.com/ceaweaver/status/1191779890665852928?s=21 …
Cea Weaver added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Homeownership is not in my vision for the future and I think it’s fundamentally incompatible with any real vision for economic justice. I also think we are in a political moment where more and more people are grappling with that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But as an organizer (one who has worked on upzoning in wealthy white suburbs!) I believe in meeting people where they are at. And I think we all can agree homeownership doesn’t look the same for everyone.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don’t think working on opposing rezonings is personally my theory of change but it’s a material reality that ppl may want to organize around and it also is an entry point to other types of work! And they can be really bad/give power to real estate, so stopping them isn’t bad!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ceaweaver @alextt
On this we will likely disagree (which is fine! organizing happens around shared self-interest, not totally identical interests!). Just b/c developers benefit doesn't mean that tenants don't also benefit. And my community-based aff. hsg. clients gotta get through zoning too.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
(and, addendum, when we're talking about power and self-interest, it's pretty important to disaggregate "real estate" into developers, property owners &, yes, homeowners. they overlap but they've got different interests, different motivations, different ways of exerting power).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Agree w that last point. But it’s pretty wild to assert that homeowners and renters have incompatibly divergent interests and that renters and developers actually have a shared material path forward.
-
-
Developers and landlords’ business model literally exploiting the basic need to have a place to rest your head. The
#HomesGuarantee demands 12M new units of social housing - that’s will require upzoning suburbs. Still don’t think developers won’t fight it!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ceaweaver @alextt
And farmers are bad because their business model is exploiting the basic need for you to eat? Admittedly equally simplistic, homeowners wants prop values to go up and that's bad for tenants. I guess, these convos are better in detail rather than in the Twitter abstract.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.