NY Housing Twitter pls weigh in and tell me what “Mitchell Lama 2.0” means to you!!!
-
To me, Mitchell Lama 2.0 would mean a massive public investment in social housing. It’s what we need.
#HomesGuarantee
Agree - social housing though is poorly defined and one could (though I wouldn’t) argue that it’s what the de blasio administration is doing right now. “
-
-
i wouldn’t consider it social housing. but it just sounds like exactly what the admin is already doing re public-private investments & regulatory agreements
-
social housing wouldn’t involve the private sector/real estate industry
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes! Our movement needs to define social housing and the precepts of ML2. I would include truly affordable, tenant owned, union and local and sustainably built, multi-generational, multi-racial, and more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is another question I often have: is “social housing” just a rebranded, free-of-stigma way of saying public housing or do like, some HPD lottery apartments count as that?
-
In Europe it generally refers to both public and ML-like housing. The implication when it's brought up in the US is generality it would serve a broader population than LIHTC and be more proactive (govt finds a spot and solicits bids) than reactive (developer applies for credits).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.